The Delhi High Court on Tuesday stayed an earlier order that had directed Amazon Technologies to pay Rs 340 crore in damages to Lifestyle Equities for alleged trademark infringement involving the ‘ Beverly Hills Polo Club’ brand. The division bench also stayed the cost imposed by the single judge.
The stay is subject to Amazon complying with the remaining directions issued by the single judge bench in the case, the division bench led by Justice Hari Shankar ordered.
In May, Amazon Technologies approached the division bench to challenge the February ruling. The single judge, Justice Prathiba M Singh, had ordered the company to stop selling, advertising, or dealing in any products that used the mark or logo similar to Lifestyle’s registered trademark.
Lifestyle Equities and Lifestyle Licensing claimed ownership of the 'Beverly Hills Polo Club' trademark and said the brand held goodwill in both domestic and global markets. They had launched the brand in India in 2007 and offer a range of products including clothing, watches, eyewear, bags, and footwear.
Amazon had told the division bench that the single judge’s findings lacked supporting evidence of infringement and said the matter needed detailed legal scrutiny.
The earlier judgment had observed that Amazon Technologies was offering similar products at a fraction of Lifestyle’s pricing, and called it a strategy of obfuscation, given Amazon’s market dominance.
The stay is subject to Amazon complying with the remaining directions issued by the single judge bench in the case, the division bench led by Justice Hari Shankar ordered.
In May, Amazon Technologies approached the division bench to challenge the February ruling. The single judge, Justice Prathiba M Singh, had ordered the company to stop selling, advertising, or dealing in any products that used the mark or logo similar to Lifestyle’s registered trademark.
Lifestyle Equities and Lifestyle Licensing claimed ownership of the 'Beverly Hills Polo Club' trademark and said the brand held goodwill in both domestic and global markets. They had launched the brand in India in 2007 and offer a range of products including clothing, watches, eyewear, bags, and footwear.
Amazon had told the division bench that the single judge’s findings lacked supporting evidence of infringement and said the matter needed detailed legal scrutiny.
The earlier judgment had observed that Amazon Technologies was offering similar products at a fraction of Lifestyle’s pricing, and called it a strategy of obfuscation, given Amazon’s market dominance.
You may also like
OpenAI's high-profile IITian employee quits, to join Meta: Who is Indian-origin researcher Trapit Bansal?
PM Modi Hails Doctors on Doctor's Day
Without EV subsidies, Musk to close up shop, head back home to South Africa: Trump
Dirt is stuck in the door mesh, you can clean it sparkling clean in 10 minutes with this homemade solution
'I'm Helplessly Bedridden': Bigg Boss Fame Bebika Dhurve Hits Back At Netizens Trolling Her Over Weight Gain (VIDEO)